Skip to main content

Integration without ESB

Because of unstructured / unplanned development over the years, we have problems because of point-to-point integration between software applications, tight coupling at those integration points, lots of code and fewer configurations.

Based on the no. of applications integrating, no. of integration points will increase. If we have point-to-point integration in all these integration points , the we will have problem in the similar magnitude.

Initially to overcome the problems of Point-To-Point integration, we had Hub & Spoke. It means Integration based on Messages. That is , a Message Broker like MSMQ is used. Different applications connect with each other through Message broker by sending messages. The problem that was encountered here was the single point of failure and also the high volume message handling capability of the Queue become a concern.

Then came the services based integration where SOA played a major role. This type of integration becomes significant especially when there is a need to integrate applications across heterogeneous platforms. Because, there interoperability is the key requirement. ESB played a key role in these types of architectures.

ESB is primarily used for :

1. Schema Transformation / Data Transformation : To Transform Data or Schema of the messages that it sends / receives


2. Intelligent Routing: To intelligently route messages to various service end points depending upon the content of those messages.

3. Service Aggregation: To act as a Fa├žade and make a series of web service calls as a single service. This is based on the pattern “Service Aggregation”. It may also include some conditional logic that defines which of the lower-level web services are called and in which order they are invoked.

4. Load Balancing: To load balance the service requests across different service end points. It may have the provision that at the time of registering a business service, we can specify the list of service end points, which can be changed later by adding or removing end points. Here it provides a layer of abstraction between service client & service provider.

5. Enforcing Security: centralized, standardized security management through security policy framework.

6. Service Management / Monitoring / Logging: Proactive / Reactive monitoring of the services performance.

With the platform vendors are maturing towards offering products that are compatible with the industry standards [especially WS-* like WS-ReliableMessaging ], ESB is gradually loosing it's position in the integration arena !

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lambda Architecture on Microsoft Azure

Gone are those days when Enterprises will wait for hours and days to look at the dashboards based on the old, stale data. In this fast world of BYOD, fitness gears and flooding of other devices, it is becoming super important  to derive out “actionable” information from huge volume of data / noise that is generated from these devices or any other data sources and act proactively on them  in real-time, to stay competitive.

At the same time, the need for having dashboards and other analytical capabilities based on the quality, cleansed, processed data still very much exists.

With the emergence of more data types and need to handle huge volume, shift is happening from the conventional data warehouse practice to cloud based data processing & management capabilities where high volume batch processing is possible at the optimized cost. Business scenarios demanding the need to process the data in real-time   More

SharePoint 2013 Architectural Trade-Offs

When planning for deploying SharePoint 2013 based Enterprise workloads, it should be done with the consideration / awareness of impact of various architectural decisions what we make. As SharePoint 2013 is a flexible platform providing lots of options in terms of configuration of the existing OOB features and development of custom development solutions to address specific business functional needs, care should be taken when making a particular decision and its impact on overall solution. Even though SharePoint is a matured product, the effectiveness of various business capabilities such as Enterprise Social, Enterprise Search, BI, Document Management, Web Content Management, and Enterprise Content Management that will be delivered based on it, in terms of addressing the business requirements depends on architecture planning. Effectiveness here means performance, security, up-time and other architectural qualities like Scalability, Reliability etc. more ...

Flexibility through product customization - How Secured it is ?

When providing solutions based on the multiple products, the success of the solution depends on what level of OOB features of those products helps in addressing the business / functional needs and what level of flexibility those products offers in terms of customization.

Also, how those products help in addressing business needs is very important in terms of time-to-market through:
Capabilities for seamless integration with federated business partners through adapters (like what Microsoft BizTalk, & StreamInsighthave rich set of adapters minimizing the development time), Partner ecosystem with solutions(like what partners have solutions basedon SharePoint in addressing various business requirements such as document storage, DRM / IRM, BI etc)
In addition to above mentioned factors, success depends on how the products allow developer community in extending its capabilities to address complex techno-business requirements.
While allowing the developer community for customization, it is a…